Gone in an Instant

02.12.2010 | Author: Marianne Sweeny
The hoopla around Google Instant has finally died down. It now remains an annoying feature that Google will diminish like the equally lauded ability to comment on results that came and went. Fingers crossed for good luck at my end that Google Instant makes its exit sooner rather than later. It is an accomplishment of engineering that fails the user experience test on a grand scale.

Users do not think as quickly as machines and they certainly cannot type as fast. Below, I am trying to find information on Bright Edge SEO (www.brightedge.com). Unfortunately, the war between auto-complete and Google Instant turns me into collateral damage as I am unable to complete my search without resorting to painstakingly slow two-finger typing.

gi1
  

Google Instant Search for BrightEdge SEO


Trying to find information on “marketing software” was equally as painful until I adapted my behavior to Google Instant’s performance. There’s something wrong with that user experience scenario.

gi-search  

Google Instant Search for “marketing software


Search engines seem fast enough for their users who have consistently asked for relevance over speed. Unfortunately, computational determination of relevance is quite different from that of a user base made up of thought-processing bipeds. For people, relevance is a matter of feeling, whether one of satisfaction, awareness or resolution. Computational relevance can be revealed in an instant with changing results based on keystroke. Human relevance takes a more time and more consideration. Search engines deliver computational relevance. We searchers are responsible for the human kind and that cannot be delivered in an instant.

Just ask Clarabelle Rodriguez who purchased eyeglass frames from an online retailer that appeared high in her search results. The harrowing tale of cyber-bullying documented in the New York Times and other media revealed that this placement resulted from negative comments about the vendor. Clarabelle thought that this vendor and its top 5 result meant that the site was good because it was relevant as in trustworthy. Google’s algorithm thought the site was good because a lot of people were talking about it and that’s logical, right?

I am ready, willing and able to sacrifice the nanoseconds of time Google Instant claims to save me in the interests of typing with all of my fingers and taking a closer than the blink-of-an-eye look at search suggestions and search results that try to keep up with my typing. For those who wish to join me, you can turn off Google Instant by clicking on the “Instant is on” link (in teeny, tiny font) to the right of the search result and selecting Off (press to enter search). Unfortunately, the Google engineers won over the Google usability folks and you have to: 1) perform a search before you can turn off Google Instant and 2) cannot make this a permanent change and so must do it every time after clearing Google’s tracking cookies.

gi-search  

How to Turn Off Google Instant


I know that it is an effort to move the mouse and click that search button. Take my word; it is worth it in the long run. Just ask Clarabelle.
Filed under:  Other stuff | Tags:

4 Comments »

  1. Marianne, this a great post! Indeed the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Instant search so far seems to be just like instant coffee - it is only great if you have not experience the real one or you just don't have the time to sit down and enjoy it.

    And to the Google topic I wonder how those good intentions will work with the recently changed algorithm concerning bad comments pushing pagerank up. I wonder how this is going to affect Google search.

    Keep them coming!

    Comment by Borislav Kiprin - 13:28 03.12.2010
  2. Many thanks for the kind words Boris. Google did come out to say that they were adjusting their algorithm to include or emphasis sentiment with regard to social site mentions. However, we still have the problem of a system using logic to perform the sentiment analysis. If Mr. Spock taught us anything, it is that human are more often than not far from logical.

    Caffeine, the May 2010 update from Google, supposedly introduced a radical form of data compression and indexing that sees Google indexing fewer pages. I believe that this is to accommodate the now bloated PageRank algorithms that are tracking and measuring so much more than just the number of incoming links. The other factor behind Instant might be savings from reduced hits to the servers by serving up cached searches.

    Those guys over in Mountain View play it pretty close to their vests. So, it is hard to be sure either way.

    Comment by marianne - 01:45 04.12.2010
  3. Good stuff! Thanks for the clarifications!

    Comment by Borislav Kiprin - 18:35 13.12.2010
  4. I like this article. Good article! Thank you so much for sharing this post.

    Comment by Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses - 02:43 20.02.2012

Leave a comment