The usability of coffee measuring spoons

31.08.2010 | Author: Eric Reiss
The discussion at FatDUX this morning focused on Nescafé. And which spoons each of us used to make coffee (note to self: we have a perfectly good, very expensive coffee maker. Why are folks drinking this instant crap?)

It seems that coffee measures are not standardized. They're not even close. In various drawers, I found no fewer than six different measuring "instruments". And their capacities ranged from less than 1 gram to over 10 grams. No wonder our morning coffee ranges from dishwater to mud.

Here's what we have:

coffee_spoons 

From left to right, we have a very expensive coffee spoon from Georg Jensen designed by Arne Jacobsen, followed by a more traditional silver teaspoon. Next, we have a miniature scoop. The wire-handled measuring spoon is an Ole Palsby design from his Eva Trio series of kitchen utensils. Finally, there is a black plastic scoop that came with a bag of coffee, and a smaller, white plastic scoop that came with some tea.

Let's see what they can hold (the first number is heaping, the second is level), measured with real, ground coffee, not the instant crap.

Jacobsen      <1 gram (<1 gram)
Traditional      3 grams (1 gram)
Scoop            4 grams (3 grams)
Palsby            9 grams (8 grams)
Black plastic  10 grams (7 grams)
White plastic   4 grams (< 1 gram)

The directions on our instant coffee suggest "one heaping spoonful per cup".

Hmm. How many different cup sizes do we have...?

How this relates to interaction design
In the field of interaction design, we know that standardization often improves usability, although it can stifle creativity and innovation in the hands of pedantic rule-followers. Could it be that we should be chosing our standards with greater care? That there are some generic patterns that benefit from standardization and "best practice" whereas there are others areas that should be avoided if they impinge on artistic value?

Take for example, the Ole Palsby measuring spoon above. It holds more coffee than almost all the other devices. In terms of volume, it doesn't equate to any of my standardized cooking measuring spoons (teaspoon, tablespoon etc.). So where did this design originate? Did Palsby pull the size out of thin air? In truth, he could have chosen a more reasonable size without compromising his design. I wish he had - my wife insists on using one scoop per cup, plus "one for the pot".  When made with this scoop, her coffee can be used to patch bicycle tires.

On the other hand, Arne Jacobsen's spoon was designed for stirring, not measuring. To change this design would also mean changing its basic function, which would be wrong from an artistic point of view (and a usability POV as well).

So, what do YOU think should be standardized? And why? Does anyone have standardized rules for standardization? If so, I hope you'll share them here.

4 Comments »

  1. No need to standardize anything. The beauty of it is in discovering how much coffee to put. The different spoons provide room for surprises; hopefully, pleasant ones.

    A discussion of usability must cover the convenience of holding the spoon and the ability to dip into the coffee can or jar. Judging by the picture, when your coffee can gets half empty, you will have hard time scooping up coffee from it using your spoon collection. You'd better get a regular size table spoon.

    -----
    Note. It is easy for me, I do not drink coffee.

    Note 2. You could make the comments box bigger?

    Comment by Dimiter Simov (Jimmy) - 14:29 31.08.2010
  2. You're quite right about standardization not necessarily leading to better usability. But in this instance, the usability of the coffee is directly related to the ability to learn something one place and to use this knowledge somewhere else.

    My wife doesn't drink coffee either. That's why she uses her "rule of thumb" - alas with EVERY spoon and scoop.

    And we're making the comment box bigger :) Thanks!

    Comment by Eric Reiss - 15:15 31.08.2010
  3. I really enjoy reading yours as the postings are so simple to read and follow. Outstanding. Please keep it up. Thanks.’

    Comment by Griffey shoes - 05:46 14.01.2012
  4. He said the two allies' militaries are closely monitoring the situation, but he didn't elaborate on the North's preparations.

    Comment by Ken Griffey shoes - 11:30 18.04.2012

Leave a comment